<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finke&#8217;s Flight Attendants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://2point8.whileseated.org/2008/02/12/finkes-flight-attendants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://2point8.whileseated.org/2008/02/12/finkes-flight-attendants/</link>
	<description>A wide-open view of the practice of street photography by Michael David Murphy, While Seated.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BennehBoy</title>
		<link>http://2point8.whileseated.org/2008/02/12/finkes-flight-attendants/comment-page-1/#comment-48338</link>
		<dc:creator>BennehBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2point8.whileseated.org/2008/02/12/finkes-flight-attendants/#comment-48338</guid>
		<description>The commentary is truly on a par with youtube bollocks.

Superb photography imho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The commentary is truly on a par with youtube bollocks.</p>
<p>Superb photography imho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Calcott</title>
		<link>http://2point8.whileseated.org/2008/02/12/finkes-flight-attendants/comment-page-1/#comment-48277</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Calcott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2point8.whileseated.org/2008/02/12/finkes-flight-attendants/#comment-48277</guid>
		<description>I've actually noticed this before: Despite the fact that Wired publicizes some pretty good photo work, their commenters are always terrible.  Most of their comments are variations on the uncapitalized "i don't know photography but this werk sux."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually noticed this before: Despite the fact that Wired publicizes some pretty good photo work, their commenters are always terrible.  Most of their comments are variations on the uncapitalized &#8220;i don&#8217;t know photography but this werk sux.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hates_</title>
		<link>http://2point8.whileseated.org/2008/02/12/finkes-flight-attendants/comment-page-1/#comment-48214</link>
		<dc:creator>Hates_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2point8.whileseated.org/2008/02/12/finkes-flight-attendants/#comment-48214</guid>
		<description>Haha, the comments are gold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, the comments are gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joni Karanka</title>
		<link>http://2point8.whileseated.org/2008/02/12/finkes-flight-attendants/comment-page-1/#comment-48211</link>
		<dc:creator>Joni Karanka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2point8.whileseated.org/2008/02/12/finkes-flight-attendants/#comment-48211</guid>
		<description>"Truly uninspired work. Wired: how far you have fallen to publish this. Such tripe. Composition is weak, contrast is non-existent and the subject matter is dull."

Maaan, I might not like things so picture perfect, and it might be a bit heavy on flash, but that comment just stunned me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Truly uninspired work. Wired: how far you have fallen to publish this. Such tripe. Composition is weak, contrast is non-existent and the subject matter is dull.&#8221;</p>
<p>Maaan, I might not like things so picture perfect, and it might be a bit heavy on flash, but that comment just stunned me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

