« Richard Kalvar (part 2 of 2) | Home | Coney Parachute Drop Head »
Got Permit?
Mason Resnick has an editorial on the Adorama News Desk concerning this story in today’s NY Times, “City May Seek Permit and Insurance for Many Kinds of Public Photography”.
“Some tourists, amateur photographers, even would-be filmmakers hoping to make it big on YouTube could soon be forced to obtain a city permit and $1 million in liability insurance before taking pictures or filming on city property, including sidewalks.
New rules being considered by the Mayor’s Office of Film, Theater and Broadcasting would require any group of two or more people who want to use a camera in a single public location for more than a half hour to get a city permit and insurance.”
I guess the idea would be to never go out shooting with your friends. Never photograph where other people are photographing, never use a tripod, and don’t hang out anywhere longer than 29 minutes.
The upside is that permits to do any of the above will be free! Ah, the inevitability of it all…
Tag: News
2point8
A wide-open view on the practice of street photography by MDM (email)
Twitter: whileseated
Scratchpad: whileseated.org
Subscribe
2point8 RSS: Entries2point8 RSS: Comments
Mailing List & Feeds
For Starters
Ways of Working, a 10-step introduction to the ins-and-outs of street photography with only nine steps. Or, look at Resources & Discussions.Search 2point8
Recent Posts
- New Winogrand Restrospective 2013-2015
- Chuck Patch Discovers Winogrand’s 1964 Worlds’ Fair Women at Boston Museum of Fine Arts
- A JPG Transcript of Jacques Derrida on Photography and Not Being Photographed
- Same Same But Different
- “Street Photography Now” Fails to Cite Sources
- Winogrand/Papageorge MIT Transcription
- Street Photography Now (printer’s proof)
- Reconsidering Winogrand
- Does Haiti’s Crisis Call for a New Photojournalism?
- Context for Papageorge “American Sports” Outtakes in HBO Documentary
No comments
Jump to comment form | comments rss | trackback uri