Warning: include_once(/home/mdm/2point8.whileseated.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-support/wordpress-support.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/mdm/2point8.whileseated.org/wp-settings.php on line 220

Warning: include_once(): Failed opening '/home/mdm/2point8.whileseated.org/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-support/wordpress-support.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php:/usr/local/php5/lib/pear') in /home/mdm/2point8.whileseated.org/wp-settings.php on line 220

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/mdm/2point8.whileseated.org/wp-settings.php:220) in /home/mdm/2point8.whileseated.org/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Plagiarism in Photography? http://2point8.whileseated.org/2007/02/16/plagiarism-in-photography/ A wide-open view of the practice of street photography by Michael David Murphy, While Seated. Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:48:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.10 By: ADIT AGARWALA, FRPS, EFIAP http://2point8.whileseated.org/2007/02/16/plagiarism-in-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-130732 Sun, 03 Oct 2010 09:09:03 +0000 http://2point8.whileseated.org/?p=124#comment-130732 The Plagiarism in Photography is like “Rubber Stamping”. Those who practice this in Photographic Art, are ON THE VERGE OF BANKRUPTSY. They have no original thinking, ideas or Visualisation. Poor souls.

— ADIT AGARWALA

]]>
By: Paul McClure http://2point8.whileseated.org/2007/02/16/plagiarism-in-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-53693 Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:11:23 +0000 http://2point8.whileseated.org/?p=124#comment-53693 When two different photographers take a picture of the same thing, you still get two different photographs. Each one with it’s own subtleties of light, distance and perspective. To me photographic plagiarism, is where one person literally takes another photographers picture and even in a subtle way, claims it as their own without giving credit where it is due.

]]>
By: markalor http://2point8.whileseated.org/2007/02/16/plagiarism-in-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-6169 Sun, 18 Feb 2007 05:41:07 +0000 http://2point8.whileseated.org/?p=124#comment-6169 ok got ya mr. whileseated.

]]>
By: andrew http://2point8.whileseated.org/2007/02/16/plagiarism-in-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-6160 Sun, 18 Feb 2007 04:20:09 +0000 http://2point8.whileseated.org/?p=124#comment-6160 wow. lovely subconscious homage.
I don’t think I have any others, but I know I’ve seen them on the flick & flog. I’ll have to put myself into a trance to locate the links.

]]>
By: Michael David Murphy http://2point8.whileseated.org/2007/02/16/plagiarism-in-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-6144 Sun, 18 Feb 2007 01:58:37 +0000 http://2point8.whileseated.org/?p=124#comment-6144 tongue in cheek never works. added two more links, to the slate piece and conscientious in the link list to flesh-out the hubub.

yes to mork examples.

]]>
By: mark http://2point8.whileseated.org/2007/02/16/plagiarism-in-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-6139 Sun, 18 Feb 2007 01:32:57 +0000 http://2point8.whileseated.org/?p=124#comment-6139 give yourself a break, photographers “reference” all the time, and yours are smart references not blatant copies.
i think it is great that photographers are subconsciously doing it. Would be great if you could find other examples..

]]>